If I would be getting a new car, I normally factor in the Miles Per Gallon that I would be able to get out of it. However, with electric cars - all having various battery sizes, kw/h and longer charge times, is there an easy way to work out how efficient it would be compared to my outlander?
For example, with my outlander (11kwh i think), on average, I would probably get 27miles out of a 4hr charge, which cost me £1.20 (say, 30p per hour), but with kona, I believe its 279 miles (64kw/h) but it may take 30 hours to charge it fully so wouldn't be better off cos its still going to cost me 30p per hour to charge it).
or it is calculated as if it takes me 4 hrs to charge a 11kwh outlander (£1.20, 2.7kw/h input, 4.4p per electric mile? ), it should then take me roughly 24hrs to charge 64kw/h kona (£7.20, 2.7kw/h input, 2.5p per electric mile)
does that make sense? There must be something similar to MPG for electric cars - kinda like "MPkW" but in clear data without having to resort to formulas!?
For example, with my outlander (11kwh i think), on average, I would probably get 27miles out of a 4hr charge, which cost me £1.20 (say, 30p per hour), but with kona, I believe its 279 miles (64kw/h) but it may take 30 hours to charge it fully so wouldn't be better off cos its still going to cost me 30p per hour to charge it).
or it is calculated as if it takes me 4 hrs to charge a 11kwh outlander (£1.20, 2.7kw/h input, 4.4p per electric mile? ), it should then take me roughly 24hrs to charge 64kw/h kona (£7.20, 2.7kw/h input, 2.5p per electric mile)
does that make sense? There must be something similar to MPG for electric cars - kinda like "MPkW" but in clear data without having to resort to formulas!?