Trex
Well-known member
Hi,
I see in many discussions in this forum about the inefficiency of charging using the petrol motor. First I will bring in these graphs from Page 1 of the sticky in technical discussions:
Now as I stated underneath this image:
"I think this is interesting because it shows our Phevs starting the petrol motor and charging the hv battery and then stopping petrol motor and going into ev mode, and then repeating, as we drive along in parallel mode speed. This is the sawtooth line showing on previous graph.
If my translation is right this test was done with a MUT-III at 1900kgs weight of the Phev."
Note: "it shows our Phevs starting the petrol motor and charging the hv battery and then stopping petrol motor and going into ev mode, and then repeating, as we drive along in parallel mode speed."
I think some people need to get their head around this statement because I see members stating that it inefficient to be using the petrol motor to charge the drive battery. Well as can be seen in the above graphs Mitsubishi are doing exactly that with the PHEV and Toyota also do it with their hybrids (I have owned a Prius and still own a Camry Hybrid which my oldest son drives as he works for me).
So the question is if it so inefficient in the conversion of petrol into electric to chemical to electric power why are companies doing it in their hybrids?
Well I think it is well known that petrol motors are inefficient as stated in Wikipedia: "Modern gasoline engines have a maximum thermal efficiency of about 25% to 30% when used to power a car. In other words, even when the engine is operating at its point of maximum thermal efficiency, of the total heat energy released by the gasoline consumed, about 70-75% is rejected as heat without being turned into useful work, i.e. turning the crankshaft."
Note: "even when the engine is operating at its point of maximum thermal efficiency". So when the petrol motor is not operating at its "sweetspot" it is even worse than 25% to 30% efficient! So hybrids when they have to run their petrol motors try to avoid the inefficient areas of running like idling when you are stopped by using a stored charge. That I think is well known here by most members.
We also know that the conversion of electric to chemical power is nowhere near as bad as 70 to 75% losses when the petrol motor is at its best. Here Wikipedia state for lithium ion batteries : "Charge/discharge efficiency 80–90%". That is for going both ways ie charge and then discharge. The Phev has also some generator, invertor losses of approx. 16% to produce electric power.
So the moral here is if you are going to run that bloody inefficient petrol motor(to drive the wheels) generate some electricity (especially at the petrol motor's sweetspot) and store it so you can turn off the petrol motor as much as possible. Mitsubishi and Toyota know it and we should too.
Regards Trex.
Image from anko
I see in many discussions in this forum about the inefficiency of charging using the petrol motor. First I will bring in these graphs from Page 1 of the sticky in technical discussions:
Now as I stated underneath this image:
"I think this is interesting because it shows our Phevs starting the petrol motor and charging the hv battery and then stopping petrol motor and going into ev mode, and then repeating, as we drive along in parallel mode speed. This is the sawtooth line showing on previous graph.
If my translation is right this test was done with a MUT-III at 1900kgs weight of the Phev."
Note: "it shows our Phevs starting the petrol motor and charging the hv battery and then stopping petrol motor and going into ev mode, and then repeating, as we drive along in parallel mode speed."
I think some people need to get their head around this statement because I see members stating that it inefficient to be using the petrol motor to charge the drive battery. Well as can be seen in the above graphs Mitsubishi are doing exactly that with the PHEV and Toyota also do it with their hybrids (I have owned a Prius and still own a Camry Hybrid which my oldest son drives as he works for me).
So the question is if it so inefficient in the conversion of petrol into electric to chemical to electric power why are companies doing it in their hybrids?
Well I think it is well known that petrol motors are inefficient as stated in Wikipedia: "Modern gasoline engines have a maximum thermal efficiency of about 25% to 30% when used to power a car. In other words, even when the engine is operating at its point of maximum thermal efficiency, of the total heat energy released by the gasoline consumed, about 70-75% is rejected as heat without being turned into useful work, i.e. turning the crankshaft."
Note: "even when the engine is operating at its point of maximum thermal efficiency". So when the petrol motor is not operating at its "sweetspot" it is even worse than 25% to 30% efficient! So hybrids when they have to run their petrol motors try to avoid the inefficient areas of running like idling when you are stopped by using a stored charge. That I think is well known here by most members.
We also know that the conversion of electric to chemical power is nowhere near as bad as 70 to 75% losses when the petrol motor is at its best. Here Wikipedia state for lithium ion batteries : "Charge/discharge efficiency 80–90%". That is for going both ways ie charge and then discharge. The Phev has also some generator, invertor losses of approx. 16% to produce electric power.
So the moral here is if you are going to run that bloody inefficient petrol motor(to drive the wheels) generate some electricity (especially at the petrol motor's sweetspot) and store it so you can turn off the petrol motor as much as possible. Mitsubishi and Toyota know it and we should too.
Regards Trex.
Image from anko