KWh
Well-known member
I agree, don't see yet how this would ever apply to my 2.4 liter engine with a whopping 99kW.Woodman411 said:Smaller displacement engines, which are the trend now due to ever tightening emissions, puts more demand on engine oil, not less.
Also for the 2 litre engine this is a very low output, if it's built well (and it is), it should run for a very long time.STS134 said:The thing with this car is that the engine only puts out around 60-70 kW, which on that power gauge is about where the "V" in the word "PHEV" is. Which means that it revs up to max power nearly every time I get in the car and go somewhere on the freeway.
Revs are not neccesarily harmful (except for your ears :roll: ), an engine with high torq at low revs has a lot more to suffer
And still they don't come close to most of the Japanese cars in any reliability index. Despite the high revs of an average Toyota, Honda or Mitsubishi engine. By the way, the European brands usually have a 30.000km or two year oil change interval in Europe.STS134 said:In a high performance European SUV, you won't use those upper rev ranges very often, because the ICE is sufficiently oversized
Stressing an engine to it's max factory output is something completely different from stressing an engine to it's mechanical limit. Again, a well built 2.0 or 2.4 has a mechanical limit that's way beyond the maximum output of just 99kW. And according to the statistics, the Japanese tend to build their engines well.STS134 said:This is done because it's better to operate a smaller engine closer to its optimal point on the consumption map when you are cruising down the freeway than a larger engine at an inefficient spot because the power demands are too low BUT, it also means that when you do want extra power, you are stressing the engine close to its mechanical limits, and unlike in cars with a larger ICE, this happens routinely*.
There are a lot of high mileage PHEV's in the Netherlands and no reports of excessive engine wear what so ever. There are some premium European brands that could only wish for such a track record (just search for VW or Audi TFSI and Google will do the rest, these are by the way engines that perform very well in the lower rev range. They just consume more oil then fuel in the process, if the timing chain doesn't break first that is). For me this leads to the same conclusion as JaapV, absolutely no worries about the 20.000km service interval. Actually my first reaction was that this is a very short interval, beïng used to 30.000 :lol:
And no worries, you don't have to buy my car, I intend to drive it for a very long time