Woodman411
Well-known member
The subject says it. Please allow me to explain. Mitsubishi decided that USA (along with Canada and Australia) would not get the fully updated model the rest of the world got for MY2019 - USA will get a forked model, meaning updated body, old powertrain. The fully updated model will probably come a year later as MY2020, whenever MY2019 shows up (it's February and no MY2019 in sight, so at least February-May 2020 for MY2020). I know why they did this - but underlying this decision, is Mitsubishi's misplaced pride, which is where the stupidity comes in. Please allow me to explain further.
Unlike the rest of the world, USA received the world version of MY2016-2018 for the first time in December of 2017. Mere months later, at the Geneva Auto Show, Mitsubishi announced the heavily revised MY2019. I thought, maybe they will wait a full year before allowing this version to arrive in the USA, giving early adopters some time to enjoy what really is an already 3-year old product. This is where the pride comes in: Mitsubishi must have convinced themselves that as the "only affordable midsize SUV PHEV" on the market (this is the overwhelming tone and message I got when I directly messaged Mitsubishi about this), it could go another year or two in the USA with the old powertrain, hence the disappointing decision to create a forked version, which still isn't here.
This is why the pride is stupidity: even though the Outlander PHEV only shares its space now with the smaller Subaru Crosstrek PHEV, later this year will come Ford's and Hyundai's SUV PHEV entries. Both entries, like the Subaru, are riding on all-new platforms, not the old, tired one the Outlander has been wearing since 2012 (the Outlander PHEV is really a messy patchwork of updates, as can be seen from some areas where it seems new, like Android Auto/Apple Carplay, whereas everything else in and around the infotainment seems like from 10 years ago. Same thing on the exterior - new LED headlights, mixed in with 2012 SUV styling). This is an "if". A big multi-one. If Ford's Escape PHEV manages to match or slightly exceed the Outlander's drive battery, and if they can match the price, and if they don't mess up the styling, and if they hopefully implement 4WD with two electric motors, there will be no reason to choose the Outlander over the Ford. None. The Ford will not only look fresh from the ground up, inside and out, but riding a new platform, its handling will no doubt run circles around the Outlander. If Mitsubishi thinks they're on equal footing with the competition a year from now because the specs are close, they are fooling themselves, because it's obvious to everyone except the blind that the Outlander is a very dated product. And if Ford misfires in a big way, then there is still Hyundai to deal with (Santa Fe PHEV), and if the electric Kona is any indication, it is unlikely they will misfire much.
Which hopefully explains why it was so important for Mitsubishi to bring the fully updated MY2019 to USA *now*, not 1 1/2 years from now. Because at least for me, I would have definitely bought it. Now, I will wait for Ford's entry, and Hyundai's. And chances are, because of Mitsubishi's stupidity and pride, they will lose a customer. Rant over![Smile :) :)]()
Unlike the rest of the world, USA received the world version of MY2016-2018 for the first time in December of 2017. Mere months later, at the Geneva Auto Show, Mitsubishi announced the heavily revised MY2019. I thought, maybe they will wait a full year before allowing this version to arrive in the USA, giving early adopters some time to enjoy what really is an already 3-year old product. This is where the pride comes in: Mitsubishi must have convinced themselves that as the "only affordable midsize SUV PHEV" on the market (this is the overwhelming tone and message I got when I directly messaged Mitsubishi about this), it could go another year or two in the USA with the old powertrain, hence the disappointing decision to create a forked version, which still isn't here.
This is why the pride is stupidity: even though the Outlander PHEV only shares its space now with the smaller Subaru Crosstrek PHEV, later this year will come Ford's and Hyundai's SUV PHEV entries. Both entries, like the Subaru, are riding on all-new platforms, not the old, tired one the Outlander has been wearing since 2012 (the Outlander PHEV is really a messy patchwork of updates, as can be seen from some areas where it seems new, like Android Auto/Apple Carplay, whereas everything else in and around the infotainment seems like from 10 years ago. Same thing on the exterior - new LED headlights, mixed in with 2012 SUV styling). This is an "if". A big multi-one. If Ford's Escape PHEV manages to match or slightly exceed the Outlander's drive battery, and if they can match the price, and if they don't mess up the styling, and if they hopefully implement 4WD with two electric motors, there will be no reason to choose the Outlander over the Ford. None. The Ford will not only look fresh from the ground up, inside and out, but riding a new platform, its handling will no doubt run circles around the Outlander. If Mitsubishi thinks they're on equal footing with the competition a year from now because the specs are close, they are fooling themselves, because it's obvious to everyone except the blind that the Outlander is a very dated product. And if Ford misfires in a big way, then there is still Hyundai to deal with (Santa Fe PHEV), and if the electric Kona is any indication, it is unlikely they will misfire much.
Which hopefully explains why it was so important for Mitsubishi to bring the fully updated MY2019 to USA *now*, not 1 1/2 years from now. Because at least for me, I would have definitely bought it. Now, I will wait for Ford's entry, and Hyundai's. And chances are, because of Mitsubishi's stupidity and pride, they will lose a customer. Rant over