MadTechNutter
Well-known member
Thanks for your feedback guys.
I live on the coast, when I say hills, they are fairy short and not steep inclines, maybe 30 seconds 5˚.
Former owner lived in Brisbane, known for it's mud flats, no proper hills there either.
It is fairly hot there. Many days exceed 30˚C but from the near new looking condition this car is in, it even still smells like a new car, I am very sure it was kept in a garage mostly away from the heat of the very harsh sun there.
I have evidence that my car was in use for 4 years and 8 months. So at 76% SoH right now, in possibly 1 year it will not meet my daily requirements in EV mode, which is very disappointing.
I have been reading that Mitsubishi expects now 80,000km out of these batteries, no idea if this information is reliable.
But from what I have been researching, like 10% drop of SoH for the LEV50 after 700 FULL 100% cycles from an official technical report, this makes a lot of sense.
There is a theory that the LEV40 is a rated down LEV50 and should last longer but that does not make sense to me.
Both have 4.1V-2.75V for a full cycle. I would expect if you wanted to derate a larger capacity battery for longer service life you would reduce the
'usable' DoD. However the discharge graphs of the LEV40 seem to be kept a secret or I am just too stupid to find them.
Could somebody please post a link to the official report of the LEV40 with graphs?
I live on the coast, when I say hills, they are fairy short and not steep inclines, maybe 30 seconds 5˚.
Former owner lived in Brisbane, known for it's mud flats, no proper hills there either.
It is fairly hot there. Many days exceed 30˚C but from the near new looking condition this car is in, it even still smells like a new car, I am very sure it was kept in a garage mostly away from the heat of the very harsh sun there.
I have evidence that my car was in use for 4 years and 8 months. So at 76% SoH right now, in possibly 1 year it will not meet my daily requirements in EV mode, which is very disappointing.
I have been reading that Mitsubishi expects now 80,000km out of these batteries, no idea if this information is reliable.
But from what I have been researching, like 10% drop of SoH for the LEV50 after 700 FULL 100% cycles from an official technical report, this makes a lot of sense.
There is a theory that the LEV40 is a rated down LEV50 and should last longer but that does not make sense to me.
Both have 4.1V-2.75V for a full cycle. I would expect if you wanted to derate a larger capacity battery for longer service life you would reduce the
'usable' DoD. However the discharge graphs of the LEV40 seem to be kept a secret or I am just too stupid to find them.
Could somebody please post a link to the official report of the LEV40 with graphs?