sg0102 said:Hi all
I ordered my 3GX company car yesterday, only to be told that my company is reviewing the inclusion of the PHEV because of reported problems with the mpg attained.
I've love a quick poll on here on people's views?
Thanks in advance...
Steve
BeeJay said:sg0102 said:Hi all
I ordered my 3GX company car yesterday, only to be told that my company is reviewing the inclusion of the PHEV because of reported problems with the mpg attained.
I've love a quick poll on here on people's views?
Thanks in advance...
Steve
This is a problem with a lot of people buying the PHEV due to the low BIK but not looking at how they use it. If you visit a mitsu garage, they will discourage you from buying it and instead recommend the diesel if you do more than 90-100 miles a day as you will be disappointed.
....
RazMan said:As already said, it is entirely dependent on your driving profile. Therefore...
Daily commute - 16 miles each way (charging at both ends) - 1000 ish mpg (about £1.50 in electricity)
Weekend - 150 miles at 45 mpg (mostly on petrol)
I entirely agree with Maby (for once :lol: :lol: )maby said:On the assumption that what we are discussing is really running costs, you really should discount any claims of fuel consumption better than around 150mpg. Unless you have a roof full of solar panels, that is the best effective running cost for the car if it never starts the petrol engine at all!
16 miles times 10 = 160 miles @ infinite MPG.RazMan said:As already said, it is entirely dependent on your driving profile. Therefore...
Daily commute - 16 miles each way (charging at both ends) - 1000 ish mpg (about £1.50 in electricity)
Weekend - 150 miles at 45 mpg (mostly on petrol)
TS said his employer had issues with MPG. So, we are talking about fuel consumption, not running cost. right?maby said:On the assumption that what we are discussing is really running costs, you really should discount any claims of fuel consumption better than around 150mpg. Unless you have a roof full of solar panels, that is the best effective running cost for the car if it never starts the petrol engine at all!
anko said:TS said his employer had issues with MPG. So, we are talking about fuel consumption, not running cost. right?maby said:On the assumption that what we are discussing is really running costs, you really should discount any claims of fuel consumption better than around 150mpg. Unless you have a roof full of solar panels, that is the best effective running cost for the car if it never starts the petrol engine at all!
Solar panels do not lower the running cost of the car, as the solar power used for your car cannot be used for running your washer and dryer.
maby said:BeeJay said:sg0102 said:Hi all
I ordered my 3GX company car yesterday, only to be told that my company is reviewing the inclusion of the PHEV because of reported problems with the mpg attained.
I've love a quick poll on here on people's views?
Thanks in advance...
Steve
This is a problem with a lot of people buying the PHEV due to the low BIK but not looking at how they use it. If you visit a mitsu garage, they will discourage you from buying it and instead recommend the diesel if you do more than 90-100 miles a day as you will be disappointed.
....
Strictly speaking, the BIK benefits are enough justification on their own - a PHEV driven as a pure petrol car will average around 40mpg which is pretty good for a large estate and the BIK saving will be hundreds of pounds per month - far more than enough to compensate for the marginally better fuel consumption you can get out of a diesel.
Enter your email address to join: